![ConEdisonNY](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 710
- 12 714 812
ConEdisonNY
United States
Приєднався 1 чер 2009
We provide power to more than 10 million people and businesses across NYC and Westchester. Reliability & accessibility are central to what we do and how we provide energy service. Leading the industry to power tomorrow is our other focus- we are committed to aggressively transitioning away from fossil fuels to a net-zero economy by 2050. To help achieve this we collaborate with many stakeholders to ensure our clean energy future is informed by principles of affordability, equity, and environmental justice. We’re also heavily investing in new technologies and the infrastructure that can get us there.
What have we achieved so far?
- Since 2009, our energy efficiency programs have prevented 11 million metric tons of carbon emissions - enough to power 1.4 million homes for a year
- We’re currently the second largest producer of solar energy in North America
- Recently, we have embarked on an 8-year project to make our systems more resilient in the face of extreme weather events
What have we achieved so far?
- Since 2009, our energy efficiency programs have prevented 11 million metric tons of carbon emissions - enough to power 1.4 million homes for a year
- We’re currently the second largest producer of solar energy in North America
- Recently, we have embarked on an 8-year project to make our systems more resilient in the face of extreme weather events
Advancing Reliable Clean City Projects for a Greener Future
Con Edison is making significant strides in promoting green energy with the advancement of three key initiatives known as the Reliable Clean City Projects.
www.coned.com/en/our-energy-future/our-energy-vision/our-energy-future-commitment
This video showcases the logistics involved in these projects, including the transportation and installation of a large transformer. The transformer was delivered to the station via a barge, then maneuvered across a 70-foot bridge and the station's perimeter wall using a rail system to position it precisely.
These interconnections are crucial for our green energy future, as they help divert the flow of electricity and increase the capacity of our system. By creating more paths and interconnections between substations, Con Edison is building a more robust and resilient grid. This enhancement will reduce outages during heat waves and other periods of high demand, ensuring a reliable power supply.
Additionally, this project will facilitate the retirement of some gas turbines, thereby reducing emissions and contributing to a cleaner, greener New York City area. Con Edison remains committed to advancing sustainable energy solutions and improving the reliability of our electric grid for a better future.
Learn more about Con Edison's Reliable Clean City Projects and their impact on New York's green energy initiatives on our website: www.coned.com/en/our-energy-future/our-energy-vision/our-energy-future-commitment
www.coned.com/en/our-energy-future/our-energy-vision/our-energy-future-commitment
This video showcases the logistics involved in these projects, including the transportation and installation of a large transformer. The transformer was delivered to the station via a barge, then maneuvered across a 70-foot bridge and the station's perimeter wall using a rail system to position it precisely.
These interconnections are crucial for our green energy future, as they help divert the flow of electricity and increase the capacity of our system. By creating more paths and interconnections between substations, Con Edison is building a more robust and resilient grid. This enhancement will reduce outages during heat waves and other periods of high demand, ensuring a reliable power supply.
Additionally, this project will facilitate the retirement of some gas turbines, thereby reducing emissions and contributing to a cleaner, greener New York City area. Con Edison remains committed to advancing sustainable energy solutions and improving the reliability of our electric grid for a better future.
Learn more about Con Edison's Reliable Clean City Projects and their impact on New York's green energy initiatives on our website: www.coned.com/en/our-energy-future/our-energy-vision/our-energy-future-commitment
Переглядів: 191
Відео
Efficient Home Heating and Cooling with Minisplits
Переглядів 53Місяць тому
In this testimonial, a Con Edison customer shares their experience with upgrading to a split unit heating and cooling system for their home. www.coned.com/en/save-money/rebates-incentives-tax-credits Upon purchasing their house, they decided to remove an old burner from the basement and opted for a more efficient and convenient solution. The split unit system, powered by an outdoor condenser, c...
Electrify Your Home for Energy Efficiency and Savings
Переглядів 140Місяць тому
Making your home more energy-efficient not only reduces your carbon footprint but also saves you money. www.coned.com/en/save-money/rebates-incentives-tax-credits/rebates-incentives-tax-credits-for-residential-customers Start by swapping out your natural gas appliances for low-maintenance electric options. Modern heat pump water heaters are up to three times more efficient than conventional ele...
ConEd’s All Electric Bucket Truck: Tools of the Trade
Переглядів 61Місяць тому
Today, we’re showcasing Con Edison’s new Terex - Navistar Class 7 bucket truck in action. www.coned.com/en/about-us/media-center/news/2022/12-13/con-edisons-first-all-electric-bucket-truck Manufactured by Terex Utilities, this advanced truck features an all-electric international chassis by Navistar, equipped with a 210 kilowatt-hour lithium-ion battery. This powerful battery provides an estima...
Make Your Home Weather-Ready and Save on Energy Costs
Переглядів 22Місяць тому
If you're looking to lower your energy usage and costs while staying comfortable year-round, making your home weather-ready is the solution. A weather-ready home helps retain cool air in the summer and warm air in the winter. Studies show that insulating and sealing air leaks can reduce energy usage and costs by 10 to 20 percent. www.coned.com/en/save-money/rebates-incentives-tax-credits/rebate...
Energy-Efficient Air Source Heat Pumps for a Greener New York
Переглядів 35Місяць тому
When you live in New York City, staying cool in the summer and warm in the winter can be challenging. Traditional window unit ACs are bulky and inefficient, but there's a better option-Air Source Heat Pumps, also known as Mini Splits. These systems provide efficient cooling in the summer and heating in the winter, offering the best of both worlds. www.coned.com/en/save-money/rebates-incentives-...
Free High-Efficiency Appliances for Eligible Customers
Переглядів 102Місяць тому
In this news segment, we explore Con Edison's innovative program that offers free high-efficiency electric appliances to eligible customers. www.coned.com/en/our-energy-future/electric-heating-and-cooling-equipment This report highlights a homeowner from the Bronx who received new appliances through the Electric Advantage program. The initiative replaces old gas appliances with state-of-the-art...
Celebrating Father's Day by Bringing Families to Work
Переглядів 219Місяць тому
Con Edison employees share the importance of bringing their families to work, offering a glimpse into their daily routines and the strong bonds they form with their coworkers. The video highlights the significance of allowing children to see where their father’s work, understand the nature of their jobs, and meet the people they interact with every day. Former linemen explain the challenges and...
Con Edison and Power in Pride: Celebrating Unity and Inclusion
Переглядів 29Місяць тому
Con Edison celebrates Pride by marching with the LGBTQ employee resource group, allies, and other New York City utilities for the first time for 'Power in Pride.' www.coned.com/en/about-us/diversity This event showcases Con Edison's commitment to fostering an inclusive workplace and supporting the LGBTQ community. Employees, both from the LGBTQ community and their allies, come together to creat...
Con Edison Celebrates Pride Month: Embracing Authenticity and Community
Переглядів 622 місяці тому
To celebrate Pride month, Con Edison employees share why Pride is more than just a month-long celebration-it’s about embracing your authentic self and fostering a sense of belonging and community. Pride promotes love, support, equality, and diversity, reminding everyone that it’s okay to be who you are, regardless of your background, nationality, or beliefs. The video emphasizes the importance ...
ConEd Summer Prep: Boosting Reliability and Energy Savings
Переглядів 2352 місяці тому
ConEd Summer Prep: Boosting Reliability and Energy Savings
News12 News Feature - Con Edison Preparing for possible outages
Переглядів 1722 місяці тому
News12 News Feature - Con Edison Preparing for possible outages
APACE at Con Edison: Celebrating the Blend of Chinese and American Cultures
Переглядів 263 місяці тому
APACE at Con Edison: Celebrating the Blend of Chinese and American Cultures
Con Edison's APACE: Celebrating Asian Heritage and Diversity
Переглядів 283 місяці тому
Con Edison's APACE: Celebrating Asian Heritage and Diversity
Con Edison: Transitioning to Electric Heating with Heat Pumps
Переглядів 3123 місяці тому
Con Edison: Transitioning to Electric Heating with Heat Pumps
Enhancing Reliability by Moving Power Lines Underground
Переглядів 1553 місяці тому
Enhancing Reliability by Moving Power Lines Underground
Con Edison's Wildfire Preparedness: Ensuring Employee Safety
Переглядів 223 місяці тому
Con Edison's Wildfire Preparedness: Ensuring Employee Safety
Memorial Day Remembrance: Honoring Our Heroes
Переглядів 353 місяці тому
Memorial Day Remembrance: Honoring Our Heroes
Con Edison's JADE Group : Celebrating Jewish Values and Community
Переглядів 223 місяці тому
Con Edison's JADE Group : Celebrating Jewish Values and Community
JADE at Con Edison: Embracing Jewish American Heritage and Diversity
Переглядів 313 місяці тому
JADE at Con Edison: Embracing Jewish American Heritage and Diversity
Un futuro con energía limpia para cada día
Переглядів 523 місяці тому
Un futuro con energía limpia para cada día
Un futuro con energía limpia para cada día (extendido)
Переглядів 173 місяці тому
Un futuro con energía limpia para cada día (extendido)
Con Edison's Augmented Reality Revolution: HoloLens 2
Переглядів 1644 місяці тому
Con Edison's Augmented Reality Revolution: HoloLens 2
Transforming Urban Spaces: Con Edison's Commitment to Biodiversity
Переглядів 1874 місяці тому
Transforming Urban Spaces: Con Edison's Commitment to Biodiversity
We're awarding over $3 Million to Support Climate Justice and Resiliency in NYC and Westchester
Переглядів 684 місяці тому
We're awarding over $3 Million to Support Climate Justice and Resiliency in NYC and Westchester
Effortless EV Charging Hack with Smart Charge NY
Переглядів 2534 місяці тому
Effortless EV Charging Hack with Smart Charge NY
Seamless EV Charging: The Real Experience with Smart Charge NY
Переглядів 3854 місяці тому
Seamless EV Charging: The Real Experience with Smart Charge NY
Green Living: Maximize Savings with Smart Charge NY
Переглядів 2494 місяці тому
Green Living: Maximize Savings with Smart Charge NY
My grandfather! Just celebrated his 90th bday!
I'm glad they're doing the work.
✓ \First, the Con Edison has failed to prove that Butler’s non-criminal consumption of a legal substance rose to the level of abuse or that Butler’s consumption of alcohol adversely affected his job performance or the public’s trust (whatever that is). Moreover, the only consequence of off-duty chemical substance abuse is that the employee will be sent for a JFE. Here, Butler was sent for a JFE on December 16, 2014 tested negative for drugs and alcohol. ✓ On December 13, 2014, Butler was purported observed by Officer Brito moving from the driver’s seat to the passenger seat a couple of hundred yards from the DWI checkpoint. Officer Brito did not testify that Butler was driving erratically or displayed other indicia of someone that was driving while impaired. The Union concedes that Officer Brito’s assumption that Butler’s actions were to avoid being identified as either a driver who had been drinking or a driver who might not have had a valid license is reasonable. It is also reasonable for Officer Brito to assume that if he could see Butler then Butler could see him. That assumption is not reasonable. ✓ Officer Brito also demonstrated his expertise and training in many facets of alcohol and drug testing but the only verified test result was the breathalyzer results. This is important because clearly Brito had an animus against Butler. Brito testified that Butler was quietly being difficult and when Brito was asked why he issued Butler a summons for refusing to test AFTER he submitted to a breathalyzer test Brito testified that Butler was walking out of the police station with a summons regardless. Butler was issued a summons that was so patently meritless that the Westchester District Attorney’s office did not even submit opposition to Butler’s motion to dismiss. (Union Exhibit “2“) ✓ The Union submits that Brito’s testimony is troubling. A police officer charged with upholding the law and who described himself as an expert in the observation of behavior under the influence of drugs and alcohol and who is also charged with knowledge of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law issued a summons that (based on his expertise) he had to know was invalid Brito practically admitted that since Butler gave him a hard time and wasted his time that night (because he did not engage in criminal conduct), he was going to give Butler a hard time. That hard time translated into the issuance of an invalid summons that forced Butler to retain counsel and utterly wasted the time of the Court that dismissed the summons that the Westchester County determined unworthy of opposition. 
✓ \First, the Con Edison has failed to prove that Butler’s non-criminal consumption of a legal substance rose to the level of abuse or that Butler’s consumption of alcohol adversely affected his job performance or the public’s trust (whatever that is). Moreover, the only consequence of off-duty chemical substance abuse is that the employee will be sent for a JFE. Here, Butler was sent for a JFE on December 16, 2014 tested negative for drugs and alcohol. ✓ On December 13, 2014, Butler was purported observed by Officer Brito moving from the driver’s seat to the passenger seat a couple of hundred yards from the DWI checkpoint. Officer Brito did not testify that Butler was driving erratically or displayed other indicia of someone that was driving while impaired. The Union concedes that Officer Brito’s assumption that Butler’s actions were to avoid being identified as either a driver who had been drinking or a driver who might not have had a valid license is reasonable. It is also reasonable for Officer Brito to assume that if he could see Butler then Butler could see him. That assumption is not reasonable. ✓ Officer Brito also demonstrated his expertise and training in many facets of alcohol and drug testing but the only verified test result was the breathalyzer results. This is important because clearly Brito had an animus against Butler. Brito testified that Butler was quietly being difficult and when Brito was asked why he issued Butler a summons for refusing to test AFTER he submitted to a breathalyzer test Brito testified that Butler was walking out of the police station with a summons regardless. Butler was issued a summons that was so patently meritless that the Westchester District Attorney’s office did not even submit opposition to Butler’s motion to dismiss. (Union Exhibit “2“) ✓ The Union submits that Brito’s testimony is troubling. A police officer charged with upholding the law and who described himself as an expert in the observation of behavior under the influence of drugs and alcohol and who is also charged with knowledge of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law issued a summons that (based on his expertise) he had to know was invalid Brito practically admitted that since Butler gave him a hard time and wasted his time that night (because he did not engage in criminal conduct), he was going to give Butler a hard time. That hard time translated into the issuance of an invalid summons that forced Butler to retain counsel and utterly wasted the time of the Court that dismissed the summons that the Westchester County determined unworthy of opposition. 
Liars liars liars !!! Thieves thieves thieves! I just got a 2,000.00 bill yea! They’ll give you easy payments I’ll be done 2025 how kind of these THIEVES
First, the Con Edison has failed to prove that Butler’s non-criminal consumption of a legal substance rose to the level of abuse or that Butler’s consumption of alcohol adversely affected his job performance or the public’s trust (whatever that is). Moreover, the only consequence of off-duty chemical substance abuse is that the employee will be sent for a JFE. Here, Butler was sent for a JFE on December 16, 2014 tested negative for drugs and alcohol. On December 13, 2014, Butler was purported observed by Officer Brito moving from the driver’s seat to the passenger seat a couple of hundred yards from the DWI checkpoint. Officer Brito did not testify that Butler was driving erratically or displayed other indicia of someone that was driving while impaired. The Union concedes that Officer Brito’s assumption that Butler’s actions were to avoid being identified as either a driver who had been drinking or a driver who might not have had a valid license is reasonable. It is also reasonable for Officer Brito to assume that if he could see Butler then Butler could see him. That assumption is not reasonable. Officer Brito also demonstrated his expertise and training in many facets of alcohol and drug testing but the only verified test result was the breathalyzer results. This is important because clearly Brito had an animus against Butler. Brito testified that Butler was quietly being difficult and when Brito was asked why he issued Butler a summons for refusing to test AFTER he submitted to a breathalyzer test Brito testified that Butler was walking out of the police station with a summons regardless. Butler was issued a summons that was so patently meritless that the Westchester District Attorney’s office did not even submit opposition to Butler’s motion to dismiss. (Union Exhibit “2“) The Union submits that Brito’s testimony is troubling. A police officer charged with upholding the law and who described himself as an expert in the observation of behavior under the influence of drugs and alcohol and who is also charged with knowledge of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law issued a summons that (based on his expertise) he had to know was invalid Brito practically admitted that since Butler gave him a hard time and wasted his time that night (because he did not engage in criminal conduct), he was going to give Butler a hard time. That hard time translated into the issuance of an invalid summons that forced Butler to retain counsel and utterly wasted the time of the Court that dismissed the summons that the Westchester County determined unworthy of opposition.
\First, the Con Edison has failed to prove that Butler’s non-criminal consumption of a legal substance rose to the level of abuse or that Butler’s consumption of alcohol adversely affected his job performance or the public’s trust (whatever that is). Moreover, the only consequence of off-duty chemical substance abuse is that the employee will be sent for a JFE. Here, Butler was sent for a JFE on December 16, 2014 tested negative for drugs and alcohol. On December 13, 2014, Butler was purported observed by Officer Brito moving from the driver’s seat to the passenger seat a couple of hundred yards from the DWI checkpoint. Officer Brito did not testify that Butler was driving erratically or displayed other indicia of someone that was driving while impaired. The Union concedes that Officer Brito’s assumption that Butler’s actions were to avoid being identified as either a driver who had been drinking or a driver who might not have had a valid license is reasonable. It is also reasonable for Officer Brito to assume that if he could see Butler then Butler could see him. That assumption is not reasonable. Officer Brito also demonstrated his expertise and training in many facets of alcohol and drug testing but the only verified test result was the breathalyzer results. This is important because clearly Brito had an animus against Butler. Brito testified that Butler was quietly being difficult and when Brito was asked why he issued Butler a summons for refusing to test AFTER he submitted to a breathalyzer test Brito testified that Butler was walking out of the police station with a summons regardless. Butler was issued a summons that was so patently meritless that the Westchester District Attorney’s office did not even submit opposition to Butler’s motion to dismiss. (Union Exhibit “2“) The Union submits that Brito’s testimony is troubling. A police officer charged with upholding the law and who described himself as an expert in the observation of behavior under the influence of drugs and alcohol and who is also charged with knowledge of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law issued a summons that (based on his expertise) he had to know was invalid Brito practically admitted that since Butler gave him a hard time and wasted his time that night (because he did not engage in criminal conduct), he was going to give Butler a hard time. That hard time translated into the issuance of an invalid summons that forced Butler to retain counsel and utterly wasted the time of the Court that dismissed the summons that the Westchester County determined unworthy of opposition. 
\First, the Con Edison has failed to prove that Butler’s non-criminal consumption of a legal substance rose to the level of abuse or that Butler’s consumption of alcohol adversely affected his job performance or the public’s trust (whatever that is). Moreover, the only consequence of off-duty chemical substance abuse is that the employee will be sent for a JFE. Here, Butler was sent for a JFE on December 16, 2014 tested negative for drugs and alcohol. On December 13, 2014, Butler was purported observed by Officer Brito moving from the driver’s seat to the passenger seat a couple of hundred yards from the DWI checkpoint. Officer Brito did not testify that Butler was driving erratically or displayed other indicia of someone that was driving while impaired. The Union concedes that Officer Brito’s assumption that Butler’s actions were to avoid being identified as either a driver who had been drinking or a driver who might not have had a valid license is reasonable. It is also reasonable for Officer Brito to assume that if he could see Butler then Butler could see him. That assumption is not reasonable. Officer Brito also demonstrated his expertise and training in many facets of alcohol and drug testing but the only verified test result was the breathalyzer results. This is important because clearly Brito had an animus against Butler. Brito testified that Butler was quietly being difficult and when Brito was asked why he issued Butler a summons for refusing to test AFTER he submitted to a breathalyzer test Brito testified that Butler was walking out of the police station with a summons regardless. Butler was issued a summons that was so patently meritless that the Westchester District Attorney’s office did not even submit opposition to Butler’s motion to dismiss. (Union Exhibit “2“) The Union submits that Brito’s testimony is troubling. A police officer charged with upholding the law and who described himself as an expert in the observation of behavior under the influence of drugs and alcohol and who is also charged with knowledge of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law issued a summons that (based on his expertise) he had to know was invalid Brito practically admitted that since Butler gave him a hard time and wasted his time that night (because he did not engage in criminal conduct), he was going to give Butler a hard time. That hard time translated into the issuance of an invalid summons that forced Butler to retain counsel and utterly wasted the time of the Court that dismissed the summons that the Westchester County determined unworthy of opposition. 
\First, the Con Edison has failed to prove that Butler’s non-criminal consumption of a legal substance rose to the level of abuse or that Butler’s consumption of alcohol adversely affected his job performance or the public’s trust (whatever that is). Moreover, the only consequence of off-duty chemical substance abuse is that the employee will be sent for a JFE. Here, Butler was sent for a JFE on December 16, 2014 tested negative for drugs and alcohol. On December 13, 2014, Butler was purported observed by Officer Brito moving from the driver’s seat to the passenger seat a couple of hundred yards from the DWI checkpoint. Officer Brito did not testify that Butler was driving erratically or displayed other indicia of someone that was driving while impaired. The Union concedes that Officer Brito’s assumption that Butler’s actions were to avoid being identified as either a driver who had been drinking or a driver who might not have had a valid license is reasonable. It is also reasonable for Officer Brito to assume that if he could see Butler then Butler could see him. That assumption is not reasonable. Officer Brito also demonstrated his expertise and training in many facets of alcohol and drug testing but the only verified test result was the breathalyzer results. This is important because clearly Brito had an animus against Butler. Brito testified that Butler was quietly being difficult and when Brito was asked why he issued Butler a summons for refusing to test AFTER he submitted to a breathalyzer test Brito testified that Butler was walking out of the police station with a summons regardless. Butler was issued a summons that was so patently meritless that the Westchester District Attorney’s office did not even submit opposition to Butler’s motion to dismiss. (Union Exhibit “2“) The Union submits that Brito’s testimony is troubling. A police officer charged with upholding the law and who described himself as an expert in the observation of behavior under the influence of drugs and alcohol and who is also charged with knowledge of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law issued a summons that (based on his expertise) he had to know was invalid Brito practically admitted that since Butler gave him a hard time and wasted his time that night (because he did not engage in criminal conduct), he was going to give Butler a hard time. That hard time translated into the issuance of an invalid summons that forced Butler to retain counsel and utterly wasted the time of the Court that dismissed the summons that the Westchester County determined unworthy of opposition. 
\First, the Con Edison has failed to prove that Butler’s non-criminal consumption of a legal substance rose to the level of abuse or that Butler’s consumption of alcohol adversely affected his job performance or the public’s trust (whatever that is). Moreover, the only consequence of off-duty chemical substance abuse is that the employee will be sent for a JFE. Here, Butler was sent for a JFE on December 16, 2014 tested negative for drugs and alcohol. On December 13, 2014, Butler was purported observed by Officer Brito moving from the driver’s seat to the passenger seat a couple of hundred yards from the DWI checkpoint. Officer Brito did not testify that Butler was driving erratically or displayed other indicia of someone that was driving while impaired. The Union concedes that Officer Brito’s assumption that Butler’s actions were to avoid being identified as either a driver who had been drinking or a driver who might not have had a valid license is reasonable. It is also reasonable for Officer Brito to assume that if he could see Butler then Butler could see him. That assumption is not reasonable. Officer Brito also demonstrated his expertise and training in many facets of alcohol and drug testing but the only verified test result was the breathalyzer results. This is important because clearly Brito had an animus against Butler. Brito testified that Butler was quietly being difficult and when Brito was asked why he issued Butler a summons for refusing to test AFTER he submitted to a breathalyzer test Brito testified that Butler was walking out of the police station with a summons regardless. Butler was issued a summons that was so patently meritless that the Westchester District Attorney’s office did not even submit opposition to Butler’s motion to dismiss. (Union Exhibit “2“) The Union submits that Brito’s testimony is troubling. A police officer charged with upholding the law and who described himself as an expert in the observation of behavior under the influence of drugs and alcohol and who is also charged with knowledge of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law issued a summons that (based on his expertise) he had to know was invalid Brito practically admitted that since Butler gave him a hard time and wasted his time that night (because he did not engage in criminal conduct), he was going to give Butler a hard time. That hard time translated into the issuance of an invalid summons that forced Butler to retain counsel and utterly wasted the time of the Court that dismissed the summons that the Westchester County determined unworthy of opposition. 
Con Ed SUCKS!
S.MART. METERS = MART.IAL S.LAVERY
SAY NO TO THE EXTORTION OF $9.50 A MONTH!! IT IS A NWO SCHEME!! CON ED WORKERS ARE ALREADY PAID TO READ METERS, IT IS PART OF THEIR EMPLOYMENT, ALSO SEND YOUR METER READING TO CON ED VIA PHOTOS!!
Esplendido ! Good Job !
What are all those conedison employees doing down there ?
A
I'm on my way there!
Great job
Guy has s great attitude. He's gonna go places!
I have watched it at least 100 times to adore that Lovely Smile which shows God Words are spoken from Your mouth. Amen
Thank you! ~LW
what voltage is present? 277/480?
🦾
Dogs are getting shocked from dis shit
My father was a Con Edison Splicer in the 1960s/70s and died from a non work related illness on Christmas eve when I was a boy! We lived in Woodside Queens and I get emotional every Christmas and just looked up Con Edison Splicer... So thanks for sharing this video of what my Dad did for a living!! Blessings 🙏 John.
Fraud Alert for CDL holders the company is using the medical department and the Westchester county police as an weapon to commit medical fraud, because the head of the corporation security manager abuse his power to commit this crime with help from the union . My Department HR Manager and my Planner was boyfriend and Girlfriend that was working out of the same department and same address so i file a internal conflict of interest against her because her live in boyfriend was suspending me and she was signing off on it . Her Name is Wendy Castro but her new name is Wendy treppicone , the same person that was my planner. Con Edison doesn’t believe in what they are having you ever year go to the learning center is just a front. First, the Con Edison has failed to prove that Butler’s non-criminal consumption of a legal substance rose to the level of abuse or that Butler’s consumption of alcohol adversely affected his job performance or the public’s trust (whatever that is). Moreover, the only consequence of off-duty chemical substance abuse is that the employee will be sent for a JFE. Here, Butler was sent for a JFE on December 16, 2014 tested negative for drugs and alcohol. On December 13, 2014, Butler was purported observed by Officer Brito moving from the driver’s seat to the passenger seat a couple of hundred yards from the DWI checkpoint. Officer Brito did not testify that Butler was driving erratically or displayed other indicia of someone that was driving while impaired. The Union concedes that Officer Brito’s assumption that Butler’s actions were to avoid being identified as either a driver who had been drinking or a driver who might not have had a valid license is reasonable. It is also reasonable for Officer Brito to assume that if he could see Butler then Butler could see him. That assumption is not reasonable. Officer Brito also demonstrated his expertise and training in many facets of alcohol and drug testing but the only verified test result was the breathalyzer results. This is important because clearly Brito had an animus against Butler. Brito testified that Butler was quietly being difficult and when Brito was asked why he issued Butler a summons for refusing to test AFTER he submitted to a breathalyzer test Brito testified that Butler was walking out of the police station with a summons regardless. Butler was issued a summons that was so patently meritless that the Westchester District Attorney’s office did not even submit opposition to Butler’s motion to dismiss. (Union Exhibit “2“) The Union submits that Brito’s testimony is troubling. A police officer charged with upholding the law and who described himself as an expert in the observation of behavior under the influence of drugs and alcohol and who is also charged with knowledge of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law issued a summons that (based on his expertise) he had to know was invalid Brito practically admitted that since Butler gave him a hard time and wasted his time that night (because he did not engage in criminal conduct), he was going to give Butler a hard time. That hard time translated into the issuance of an invalid summons that forced Butler to retain counsel and utterly wasted the time of the Court that dismissed the summons that the Westchester County determined unworthy of opposition.
A very important and dangerous job be safe and God bless 🙏
Ug
Maybe stop the power cuts and I’ll think about believing it
Make perfect sense
Hey, at least ONE thing in NYC will be clean.
This shit is fucking hilarious... people are fucking stupid these days
Make America great again Donald Trump 2021🇺🇲! Screw the green new deal
these meters cause cancer say no to smart meters
everything causes cancer.
Ese señor sienpre está si camisa bajo camara
Good explanation
How the water is drained out from these underground vault in rainy seasons.
Good afternoon. Please send us a private message for assistance. Thank you.
They pump the water out..
As I said just a minute ago on another video somewhat like this. There is a "workaround" (I'll leave it at that) around literally everything (except where your soul will spend eternity. But I digress.) Do your homework. People just refuse to "put in the time and do THEIR OWN homework." And for something of such a serious nature such as this it just boggles my mind. That is all.
Thanks
BS
Too bad it’s permanently closed
What is the goal of the video? Let us know what you are trying to accomplish and why. We can then let you know if it is effective.
Are the lights? Yes? Then it was effective 🙄.
\First, the Con Edison has failed to prove that Butler’s non-criminal consumption of a legal substance rose to the level of abuse or that Butler’s consumption of alcohol adversely affected his job performance or the public’s trust (whatever that is). Moreover, the only consequence of off-duty chemical substance abuse is that the employee will be sent for a JFE. Here, Butler was sent for a JFE on December 16, 2014 tested negative for drugs and alcohol. On December 13, 2014, Butler was purported observed by Officer Brito moving from the driver’s seat to the passenger seat a couple of hundred yards from the DWI checkpoint. Officer Brito did not testify that Butler was driving erratically or displayed other indicia of someone that was driving while impaired. The Union concedes that Officer Brito’s assumption that Butler’s actions were to avoid being identified as either a driver who had been drinking or a driver who might not have had a valid license is reasonable. It is also reasonable for Officer Brito to assume that if he could see Butler then Butler could see him. That assumption is not reasonable. Officer Brito also demonstrated his expertise and training in many facets of alcohol and drug testing but the only verified test result was the breathalyzer results. This is important because clearly Brito had an animus against Butler. Brito testified that Butler was quietly being difficult and when Brito was asked why he issued Butler a summons for refusing to test AFTER he submitted to a breathalyzer test Brito testified that Butler was walking out of the police station with a summons regardless. Butler was issued a summons that was so patently meritless that the Westchester District Attorney’s office did not even submit opposition to Butler’s motion to dismiss. (Union Exhibit “2“) The Union submits that Brito’s testimony is troubling. A police officer charged with upholding the law and who described himself as an expert in the observation of behavior under the influence of drugs and alcohol and who is also charged with knowledge of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law issued a summons that (based on his expertise) he had to know was invalid Brito practically admitted that since Butler gave him a hard time and wasted his time that night (because he did not engage in criminal conduct), he was going to give Butler a hard time. That hard time translated into the issuance of an invalid summons that forced Butler to retain counsel and utterly wasted the time of the Court that dismissed the summons that the Westchester County determined unworthy of opposition. 
Too busy fiddling around with US Women's Football and other social/political topics, showing us how 'right on' ConEdison are to get around to providing electricity to their customers. They can't even provide access to information of the Manhattan outage. Their service outage map was itself an outage. How convenient for them, so the news media companies, the ones in NY that were not effected can't even publicise it further, all a bit of an embarrassment for them. Soon blamed on something as far removed from ConEdison as they can think of. Just CONCENTRATE on providing a service, leave all the 'pride' malarkey and other social/political garbage out of it.
Does Con Ed provide dorm services for employees?
A link on these videos would be useful.
Thank you! Very informational :)
How about a video on how to read these meters?
Let's see. RF radiation, dirty electricity, fire risk, spying.
good